City Council Power Grab or Clarification of Port Authority?

I appreciate the R-E editorial of 4/17 regarding changes to the Port Authority Enabling Resolution. I haven’t done any in depth legal analysis of these changes, but two things stand out for me.  First, giving the city total discretion over the levy, and two, taking away citizen rights to petition for a reverse referendum.

Assuming the City Attorney is correct in saying the City Council has the authority to make these changes, the question becomes a political issue.  I don’t recall hearing the Port Board object to having its levy authority, and consequently its political independence, smothered.

One of the reasons the City adopted a Port, as opposed to an EDA, was to establish an independent political subdivision, and to the extent possible, insulate it from City politics.  I understand the City has a greater stake in the Port now as it is contributing directly to the Port’s budget, but once the River Bluff properties are sold, the Port should be standing financially on its own feet.  Why then absolute authority over the Port levy which the new resolution calls for.  The previous resolution stated the City shall approve the Port’s levy request.  State statute also says the same, however, some can argue there is ambiguity in whether the City must approved a levy request.  So, why not resolve any ambiguity in favor of the original intent of the Port’s operation?

Reverse Referendum:  Why remove this right, especially in these economic times. What problem is this solution fixing?

I think much more important than the Blue Ribbon Panel weighing in, is for the City Council to have an open, frank discussion of the purpose and long-term impact of these proposed changes.



Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Accountability, Economic Development, Red Wing, Red Wing City Council, Red Wing Port Authority

One response to “City Council Power Grab or Clarification of Port Authority?

  1. sueinmn

    So is the city attempting to remove citizens rights by removing language allowing a reverse referendum? Why remove this right and legally can they do so? Does this council prefer NO CITIZEN participation while performing the publics business, and if so it goes to show the seriousness of citizens needing to pay attention to the actions of this council. Losing the right to a referendum would be a serious loss of citizens rights and any future “say” regarding port decisions. This could have serious consequences to the public and this council appears to care little of public concerns. Is it ever too late for a recall process to take place? Can we afford to wait until no public input is allowed by removing the right to a referendum? In my opinion, these closed door decision makers need replacing and the sooner the better.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s